Voici finalement un lien pour l'étude complète (si j'ai bien compris il y a autant de chevreuils tués illégalement (Erreur d'identification et braconnage, que cet accroissement de 12000 cerfs)
Lautre élément est le suivant
During this study, hunters had experience with 3 years of APRs, so they were familiar with field difficulties of identifying legal and sub-legal antlered deer, and they perceived fewer antlered deer would be harvested. The concern of shooting an illegal buck was identified as the strongest reason APRs would reduce deer hunting enjoyment (Appendix C, Table 3.27).
The proportion of hunters that agreed APRs would reduce their enjoyment of deer hunting varied between 0.22 – 0.37 (Table 3.
. Of these hunters, 0.62 – 0.74 agreed deer hunting enjoyment would be less because they could not shoot a spike buck or buck with 2 or more points on 1 side. Of hunters that agreed APRs would reduce their enjoyment of deer hunting, the proportion that also believed the APRs were too complex was between 0.44 – 0.63. But the strongest reason
I found for APRs reducing deer hunting enjoyment was a concern about shooting an illegal buck. About three-fourths (0.69 – 0.84) of hunters who indicated APRs decreased their deer hunting enjoyment agreed they were concerned about shooting an illegal buck (Table 3..Wallingford, B. D. 2012. White-tailed deer antler point restrictions, harvest and survival rates, and hunter support: perception versus reality. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA. | Download |
http://s3.amazonaws.com/file-storage.IN ... INAL-1.pdf
Personnellement j'ai finalement opter d'être en défaveur du 3 pointes.
Si les trois quarts des chasseurs mentionnent dans ce sondage que le plaisir de la chasse diminue, je ne verrais pas pourquoi je l'appuierais. Je chasse par plaisir et ne souhaite pas faire partie de cette statistique fondamentale.
Connexion
Inscription
FAQ
Rechercher
